Am 23.09.2016 um 05:24 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Thomas Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2016 um 16:13 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
URIBL_BLOCKED shows you are using still a dns-forwarder and so won't
get
results from a lot of blacklists
fix that - use a local caching resolver with *no forwarding* and if you
are using dnsmasq just don't do that for a inbound mailserver
I found an instruction here for a debian system
https://manageacloud.com/configuration/local_dns_caching
Seems to work local dns caching but I dont understand why I shouldnt
use it for inbound mailserver and why I still see URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
Lists shouldn't have said "caching", that confuses the issue. Caching
and recursion are two different, unrelated pieces.
seriously?
"with *no forwarding*" is not clear enough that one comes two days later
with a dnsmasq setup using opendns as forwarders where in fact i said
explicit
"fix that - use a local caching resolver with *no forwarding* and if you
are using dnsmasq just don't do that for a inbound mailserver"
As far as I understand it, dnsmasq cannot be used for local recursion
yes, and hence in my orginial mail you are party quting i statet don't
use that crap, see above
