On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, geoff.sa_users_161...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
OK, blindly following your suggestion yielded the following; does it tell you
anything?
Dec 5 22:20:11.805 [30090] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0
spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
0 spams. You need to train it with at least 200 ham and 200 spam messages
before it can start analyzing messages.
Are you training at all?
Are you training the right Bayes database?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it
will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the
wrongs it would do and the harms it would cause if improperly
administered. -- Lyndon B. Johnson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 days until Bill of Rights day
