On 10/13/2017 04:45 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I don't use Kam.cf <http://Kam.cf> as it is very prone to false
positives and way too aggressively scored by default. I'm pretty happy
with my current setup with 3.4.1 though.
If you are happy with your SA accuracy, don't change a thing. :) Have
you tried the KAM.cf lately?
KAM.cf does have high scores when you first look at it but if you have
other SA add-ons that subtract points for being "good", then the high
KAM.cf scores complement things well. Also, I am using MailScanner and
the default block score is 6.0 which helps a bit too. My custom rule
scores tend to be high on both ends.
12. lokakuuta 2017 17.07.41 GMT+03:00 "Kevin A. McGrail"
<[email protected]> kirjoitti:
>On 10/12/2017 9:25 AM, AJ Weber wrote:
>> I'm open to new rules, plug-ins, etc. Spam volume is only getting
>> worse, and these spammers are getting more creative.
>
>Hi AJ,
>
>I have to say that 3.3.0 is pretty old. I'd look to run a newer
>version, invest some time into researching a few RBLs and consider
>adding my KAM.cf <http://KAM.cf> file.
>
>Regards,
>KAM
--
David Jones
