> >> 4) Is the another GUI Subversion client that has better performance > >> when content is being checked out to a Windows network drive. > > > > You won't find much variation, because they almost all use the same > > core libraries or code. > > What about SvnAnt ?
SvnAnt uses the svnClientAdapter.jar, which in turn uses one of: (1) JavaHL - Java/JNI to C++ core library interface [1] (2) SvnKit - pure Java implementation [2] (3) command line client, for example [3] Performance should be best for JavaHL. But a network drive is a network drive. And the current working copy format generates many files. Michael [1] http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html [2] http://svnkit.com/ [3] http://www.sliksvn.com/
