On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Ludwig, Michael <michael.lud...@delphi-mb.de> wrote: >> >> 4) Is the another GUI Subversion client that has better performance >> >> when content is being checked out to a Windows network drive. >> > >> > You won't find much variation, because they almost all use the same >> > core libraries or code. >> >> What about SvnAnt ? > > SvnAnt uses the svnClientAdapter.jar, which in turn uses one of: > > (1) JavaHL - Java/JNI to C++ core library interface [1] > (2) SvnKit - pure Java implementation [2] > (3) command line client, for example [3] > > Performance should be best for JavaHL. > > But a network drive is a network drive. > > And the current working copy format generates many files. > > Michael > > [1] http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html > [2] http://svnkit.com/ > [3] http://www.sliksvn.com/ >
With regards to the Windows Subversion Client. If several scripts are using the Subversion Command line client is the client shared or is a separate client launched when separate scripts are ran at the same time ?
