Hi, I'm relatively new to Tap, and I am starting with Tap 4 and Eclipse. I've been using the directory structures as seen in Kent Tong's book. I also noticed the Tapestry examples (vlib and workbench) have html files that live in the root of the application, instead of in web-inf. Is this a standard thing to do?
I've read that things inside web-inf can't be accessed directly by a web browser, so that seems like the correct place for the .page/.jwc's to go. Like I said, I have something that _works_, I am just curious to see if there are benefits to other methods, or drawbacks to mine (i'm sure my approach is naive): workspace\projectname workspace\projectname\build\classes (output dir for compiled classes) workspace\projectname\deploy (holds my war file when I export from eclipse) workspace\projectname\src\mypackage\ (no .java at this level) workspace\projectname\src\mypackage\model\ (classes that know nothing about tapestry) workspace\projectname\src\mypackage\controller\ (classes for pages and components) workspace\projectname\src\META-INF\ (holds hivemind.xml and sessions.xml) workspace\projectname\WebContent\css (css files) workspace\projectname\images (jpgs) workspace\projectname\META-INF (I think eclipse made this dir and manifest.mf for me) workspace\projectname\WEB-INF (all my .html, .page and .jwc files live directly in WEB-INF, as well as projectname.application and web.xml) workspace\projectname\lib (hold jars for jscookmenu, BIRT, etc) workspace\projectname\reporting\BIRT (holds birt engine, jars, resources, etc) When I export my project to a WAR, things in workspace\projectname\build\classes get put in WEB-INF\classes Please let me know what you think. I'm sure you guys have better organized project structures. For instance, do your Tapestry projects look like this? http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/projectconventions.html Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
