Case in point ;-) http://www.nabble.com/Directly-map-a-bean-to-HTML-form-tf2845102.html#a7944709
On 12/20/06, D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Emmanuel - I tend to view this as a free intellectual market at work. There were inadequacies in Tapestry and strengths in Wicket that drove this one user to choose Wicket over Tapestry (and the other frameworks). If enough people agree with him, either Tapestry addresses these issues and becomes a better framework, or users migrate to Wicket (or some other framework du jour). Either way, we developers end up with a better framework. Given the amount of work that has already been invested in Tapestry and the community that has been built around it, I think the first option is much more likely, but then I'm no oracle :-) Daniel On 12/20/06, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I came across this article > http://www.infoq.com/news/2006/12/wicket-vs-springmvc-and-jsf and > thought > probably someone here could comment. Is Tapestry really losing the > battle > against Wicket? > > Emmanuel > >
