Just call me Paris ;-) (mythology joke...)
On 12/21/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uh oh ....You just brought up their biggest Achilles heal. Good for you :) On 12/20/06, D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Case in point ;-) > > http://www.nabble.com/Directly-map-a-bean-to-HTML-form-tf2845102.html#a7944709 > > > On 12/20/06, D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Emmanuel - > > > > I tend to view this as a free intellectual market at work. There were > > inadequacies in Tapestry and strengths in Wicket that drove this one user to > > choose Wicket over Tapestry (and the other frameworks). If enough people > > agree with him, either Tapestry addresses these issues and becomes a better > > framework, or users migrate to Wicket (or some other framework du jour). > > Either way, we developers end up with a better framework. Given the amount > > of work that has already been invested in Tapestry and the community that > > has been built around it, I think the first option is much more likely, but > > then I'm no oracle :-) > > > > Daniel > > > > > > On 12/20/06, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I came across this article > > > http://www.infoq.com/news/2006/12/wicket-vs-springmvc-and-jsf and > > > thought > > > probably someone here could comment. Is Tapestry really losing the > > > battle > > > against Wicket? > > > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
