Hi Fernando, I think so, if you want to be wisiwig, use regular tags, but programmers turn to use the component tags for that as it is easier to read, so that's really a 'policy' issue, if it's a team work i think regular tags are better.
Angelo Fernando Padilla wrote: > > I am actually using this syntax, so that I should get the best of both > worlds. > > > > > Angelo Chen wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Initially I use dreamweaver to design the page, and make it a point to >> use >> regular tags like: >> my Link , this will make it easier for me to go back to dreamweaver for >> page >> update, but later I found out that I started to write <t:actionLink>my >> link</t:actionLink> and not coming back any more to dreamweaver, I fire >> up >> FireBug, change the layout in the fly, and then update the t5 template >> and >> try again, it works quite well with me, but this will not work well if >> the >> pages have to be maintained by a html designer, is this what you are >> doing >> too? thanks. >> >> Angelo >> >> >> Jonathan Barker wrote: >>> >>> HTML, CSS and a browser and focus on appearances. With T5, it's easier >>> just >>> to run your app and tweak on the fly. >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-T5--Tapestry-evaluation-%2B-questions-tp16368331p16376111.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
