Thanks for your concern Rob, but I'm pretty comfortable evaluating things myself and have already read that discussion. The backward compatibility history of Tapestry will certainly be taken into consideration. (that was the distraction I mentioned) Sometimes it's better to break backwards compatibility rather than keep sub-optimal design, and it's much better than being mostly backwards compatible except for a few details that trip people up unexpectedly. (voice of experience talking)
To everyone else - thanks for your help and comments, hopefully I'll get some time to look into them early this week. Andy. Rob Smeets wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > Be wise and dig around the Internet to find answers to your questions and > don't turn to this list since they won't offer you a non-biased answers. > For > a starter go to theserverside.com where recently a discussion was held on > Tapestry. The link is: > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=48743 > > Personally, I won't advise you to go with Tapestry due to it's bad record > on > backward compatibility. > > Rob > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-T5--Tapestry-evaluation-%2B-questions-tp16368331p16395620.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
