You, good sir, rule.
Thanks for the code. :)
-Filip
On 2008-04-14 21:23, nicholas Krul wrote:
Hello....
Rob, I asked for help... I got it. If you cant contribute, don't. I have no
respect for people who only seek to tear down and not to build.
And to everyone else....
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5HowToUsePersistentFieldStrategy
:)
thanks
--nK
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Blower, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Our codebase? So, you do use T5 then Rob? Poor you, I sympathise with
using technology you dislike.
I'm really looking forward to your perfectly designed web framework where
you took the trouble to "Think and design before you code" though, avoiding
temptations and saving much misery and pain. When are you due to announce
it?
I've got a great name for you to use, you could call it 'Second Coming'.
Yours friendliest,
Andy.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Smeets [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2008 17:10
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: RequestGlobals in a PersistentFieldStrategy
In fact, if I was doing the code again, module classes would not have
instance methods, only static methods.
Please, please help. Howard, take your hands off that code, ok. You'll
break
our current code base. You may do it in Tapestry 6. Because, again that
would be it's own beast- as usual another 100% backward incompatible
with
previous versions. Tapestry users, BEWARE!!
A piece of advice to Howard: Think and design before you code. If you
do so
you would avoid all these temptations and save so many people misery
and
pain.
Yours friendly,
Rob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
