In how far shoult GAE be a showstopper for anything? It is neither the promised land, nor some gift from the gods. I would rather find it a showstopper, if shady compromises were made just to cater to a somewhat castrated platform which is actually only beneficial, if you should happen to have the next viral killer-application and need to scale fast and to millions of users.
For everything else I can't see the summary benefit of it. If you need the scaling you are forced to rewrite large portions of your app eventually and if not, there is no reason to bend around googles subset of Java. But of course that is only my personal opinion. 2009/4/17 Christian Edward Gruber <christianedwardgru...@gmail.com> > Well, I did, but I wasn't allowed to say anything. ;p > > Christian. > > > On 16-Apr-09, at 23:58 , Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > Em Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:42:45 -0300, Alex Kotchnev <akoch...@gmail.com> >> escreveu: >> >> I'm not sure about everyone else, but for me this is a BIG issue and >>> is one of the reasons holding me back from moving my app to the 5.1 >>> beta. Most likely I'll hold off on upgrading to 5.1 final if it >>> doesn't support GAE. >>> >> >> The funny side of this situation is that it didn't even exist until some >> days ago, before Java support in GAE was released. Unless Alex knew this >> before everyone . . . :) >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor >> http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > Christian Edward Gruber > e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com > weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
