I would not use spring in any new projects. Just my opinion though. On May 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, bhorvat <horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been reading up a bit on all of this transactions (as I am not that > familiar with it yet :) ), and the last thing that I have read is > http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/transaction.html > > It seams to me that transactions that offer EJB like CMT are a bit more > heavyweight then it is needed. So I think that I would like to avoid all > them and try to use the spring instead. However I do like the fact that > Hibernate implementation of OSIVF is a bit more lightweight. > > Can someone show some good example of implementing all of this and merging > it with tapestry? I am trying to search but nothing really nice so far, and > someone who is more experience can know some good results. > > Also there was mention here that OSIVF should be avoided since it is an > antipatern, can someone put some good words for the OSIVF and their > experience with all of this? > > cheers and tnx all > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-Transactions-tp5713299p5713339.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
