I have some vague recollection that performance of mod_proxy_ajp tested
just /slightly /better than mod_jk.
Tim Funk wrote:
Performance (IIRC while reading on the mailing lists) is about the
same. mod_proxy_ajp should be easier to configure and install since it
comes bundled with apache and it should be much easier to install than
jk.
e wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to see Apache 2.2 has been released. I'm curious if anyone
has
any insights into the performance of mod_proxy_ajp vs mod_jk? Is it
more
efficient, or just easier to configure? Are there any sample
configurations available to look at?
Thanks,
E
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
