Hi, I am using apache 2.2.11 and mod_jk 1.2.28 and tomcat version 5.5.27 and 5.5.20
Thanks, Madhuri --- On Mon, 8/3/09, André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote: > From: André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> > Subject: Re: after setting timeouts got puzzling results > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> > Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 1:48 PM > Madhuri Patwardhan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We are running with apache loadbalancer and 19 tomcat > workers loadbalanced. > > I went through the timeout document and other > documents, and my apache access log in detail before > choosing the timeout values. I am seeing a bit surprising > results after setting timeouts. > > > > Earlier we did not have connect_timeout, > prepost_timeout, reply_timeout, recovery_options and > ping_mode set. After going through the documents and > analyzing our application logs for timings I set the > following values. > > > > ping_mode = A > > reply_timeout=60000 > > recorvery_options=3 > > socket_connect_timeout=5000 > > > > Ping_timeout is set to the default value that is > 10000. > > > > I saw that one of the tomcat instances had out of > memory errors and loadbalacer still showed that worker in > good state for 24 hours. I felt after setting these timeouts > infact it should have detected conditions like this quickly. > What am I missing? > > > One thing that is missing above, and would help someone to > answer, are the versions of Apache, mod_jk and Tomcat you > are using. > (At least I suppose it is mod_jk). > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
