"Christopher Schultz" <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote in message news:4ae5cabb.7070...@christopherschultz.net... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Konstantin, > >> Those are NOT comments. The JSP comments are <%-- --%>. >> >> I think that if you switch to XML syntax for JSP pages (using jspx >> files instead of jsp), those will be treated as XML comments and >> properly ignored. > > Apologies for not thinking about that: Pete, if you're not using XML > syntax (as I expected you were), then your complaint is not valid: your > JSP is /not/ an XML document. > > If you use .jspx (I think?), then XML syntax will be acceptable. > >> So I am sure that the above is not a Tomcat bug. > > On the other hand, shouldn't the JSP compiler pass-through everything > except for directives? HTML is a common enough use case for JSP that > SGML comments ought to be tolerated in these cases. >
Except for the fact that section 5.4 of the (2.1) JSP spec precludes having anything except <jsp:param /> in the body of a <jsp:include> element. Allowing template text in there is then a Container-specific feature and so renders the webapp non-portable. It would be a bug if the error happened for a page in XML syntax however. > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkrlyrsACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDDGACglcZR5X+kwfi1y2w82Sb5nuW5 > hioAn1I2ZY0r3CZSanzU9TpMyHEXWfTr > =XZ+i > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
