On 13.11.2009 15:49, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Thomas, > > On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote: >> Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat >> like "Generated in 22220 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20 >> msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF-stream since I just want to test a >> simple case. > > Okay, this was the response as read by mod_jk from Tomcat: > > 200 OK > X-Powered-By:Servlet 2.4; JBoss-4.2.3.GA (build: SVNTag=JBoss_4_2_3_GA > date=200807181417)/JBossWeb-2.0 > Pragma:no-cache > Expires:Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT > Cache-Control:no-cache > Cache-Control:no-store > Content-Type:text/html;charset=UTF-8 > Content-Language:de > Content-Length:433 > > <!DOCTYPE.HTML.PUBLIC."-//W3C//DTD.HTML.4.01.Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > <html> > <head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> > <title>JSP.Page</title> > </head> > <body> > Generated.in.351416.msec[query.time: 351384 msec, processing time: 32 > msec] for 824727 rows > <p/><a.href="index.htm">Back > </body> > </html> > > Are you saying that the web browser does not show anything? I'd be > interested in seeing what the browser is receiving, because that HTML is > pretty ugly (i.e. not well-formed). > > I suspect that the web browser is giving up before the response is sent. > 351384ms is a long time (almost 6 minutes). I wouldn't be surprised if > your client has a timeout of 2 or 3 minutes. Maybe even less. > >> Besides, I check the OS, Httpd and mod_jk version. They are: > >> On the machine with mod_jk 1.2.26: > > So, does this problem occur with 1.2.26, too? At first, you said that > 1.2.26 was working and that 1.2.28 was not working. Has that changed?
I think the reproduction with html is not working because of some other reasons likely not related with mod_jk. In the original message he has a jk error message referring to errno 11=EAGAIN. There is a change between 1.2.26 and 1.2.28 related to how EAGAIN gets handled while waiting for data. So I can imagine he really hit a bug there, although I'm not sure, because we have to check, whether that observation also happens without socket_timeout and reply_timeout. His attempt to make a more simple test case using the html response doesn't produce any mod_jk error log line, so I would say it's something else, like e.g. MSIE not wanting to show to short pages or whatever. I added this to the BZ 48191. Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
