> Daniel,
> 
> On 2/8/2011 4:56 PM, Daniel Savard wrote:
> > However, increasing this limit for all instances may lead to a 
> > situation where enough instances are claiming more memory 
> at the same 
> > time and beyond the physical memory available.
> 
> Exactly. With the low-memory limit on each JVM, you are 
> basically limited to OOME on a single JVM, while a 
> high-memory limit on each JVM means that they can more easily 
> interfere with each other due to paging.
> 

Okay, that's what I figured, so I think we're all on the same page.
Thanks much. I guess the only way to be 100% certain is to try it, watch
it carefully, and be ready to reconfigure and restart all the tomcats if
it looks like things are going to get dicey (like if I see iowait and/or
swap usage start to climb). Thankfully, because of the way we do load
balancing, this can be accomplished gracefully without severely
impacting customers.

--Eric







Disclaimer - February 8, 2011 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for Tomcat Users List. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions 
presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent 
those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management. Warning: 
Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management has taken 
reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the 
company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the 
use of this email or attachments. 
This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to