On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Peter Roßbach <p...@objektpark.de> wrote:

> HI Vadzim,
>
> as you like a hot HTTP-JMX access use
>
> http://www.jolokia.org/
>
> chili...
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 23.05.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Vadzim Mikhalenak:
>
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Konstantin Kolinko <
> knst.koli...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> 2012/5/22 Vadzim Mikhalenak <vadzim.mikhale...@gmail.com>:
> >>> Hello  Christopher,
> >>> *
> >>> *
> >>> Thank you for the reply! Yes, link
> >>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/monitoring.html is for version
> >> 5.5
> >>> but we are migrating from version 6 (sorry for the confusion) but the
> >>> configuration above was valid for version 6
> >>>
> >>
> >> It works (or at least tries to start, to my surprise) in Tomcat 6 with
> >> this particular AJP/1.3 connector implementation, but it is not
> >> documented and not supported.  Other connectors do not support those
> >> attributes and this one was removed from Tomcat 7.
> >>
> >> Tomcat 6 and 7 use JMX support provided by JRE and if you need http
> >> access to it, the common way is to use "JMXProxy" servlet that is part
> >> of the manager webapp.
> >>
> >> It is all is documented
> >> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/monitoring.html
> >>
> >>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/manager-howto.html#Using_the_JMX_Proxy_Servlet
> >>
> >> or see the same docs for Tomcat 7.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> <Connector port="${AJP.PORT}"
> >>>           handler.list="mx"
> >>>           mx.enabled="true"
> >>>           mx.httpHost="${JMX.HOST}"
> >>>           mx.httpPort="${JMX.PORT}"
> >>>           protocol="AJP/1.3" />
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *
> >>> *
> >>> and gave us opportunity to manage JMX beans using  http://
> >>> ${JMX.HOST}:${JMX.PORT} (please see
> >>>
> >>
> http://logback.qos.ch/manual/images/chapters/jmxConfigurator/mx4j_jetty.gif
> >>> )
> >>> In version 7 I couldn't see any possibility to do it.
> >>> I've noticed that in Connector class of version 6
> >>> if ("AJP/1.3".equals(protocol)) {
> >>>               setProtocolHandlerClassName
> >>>                   ("org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler");
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler used JkMain which used JkMX where
> >>> HttpAdapter from mx4j-tool.jar was used.
> >>>
> >>> but in version 7
> >>> else if ("AJP/1.3".equals(protocol)) {
> >>>               setProtocolHandlerClassName
> >>>                   ("org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpAprProtocol");
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So do we have possibility to manage JMX beans in version 7 as we could
> in
> >>> version 6? (please see
> >>>
> >>
> http://logback.qos.ch/manual/images/chapters/jmxConfigurator/mx4j_jetty.gif
> >>> )
> >>>
> >>
> >> Please
> >> 1. Post your response below the text that you are replying to (aka "do
> >> not top-post")
> >> 2. Do not cross-post questions between users@ and dev@ lists.
> >>
> >> This one belongs to users@.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Konstantin Kolinko
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I know about JMX Proxy Servlet but it was more preferable to use MX4J
> page
> > and I thought there is simple way to configure it (as it was configured
> in
> > 6 version).
> > I'll be looking for solution to get mx4j page working.
> > Thanks again for your help!
> > Sorry for the trouble.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Vadim.
>
> Hello  Peter,
>

Thanks for the link. May be I'll try it soon :)

Best regards,
Vadim.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to