Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
      From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
 To: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com> 
Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins 
<david.blev...@gmail.com> 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):


                <dependency>
                    <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
                    <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
                    <version>0.2-incubating</version>
                </dependency>
                <dependency>
                    <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
                    <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
                    <version>0.1-incubating</version>
                </dependency>




Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau




2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> great, thks
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>:
>> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete
>> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same
>> url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>> <users@tomee.apache.org>
>> Cc: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>
>>
>>    From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>> <radcor...@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Hello Roberto,
>>
>> is it broken again? I get 404
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Roberto
>>>
>>>      From: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>
>>>  To: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>>> <users@tomee.apache.org>
>>>  Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
>>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are
>>> looking into it.
>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>      From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>>>  To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>
>>>  Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> First -- welcome, Roberto!  Great to see you on the list :)
>>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT.  Would be great to track
>>> these.  What CI are you using?  We could set something up on the Apache side
>>> if needed.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles
>>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests
>>> we got the following results:
>>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
>>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
>>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
>>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
>>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta -
>>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a
>>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket -
>>> OK
>>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
>>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing
>>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment,
>>> but it will be there.
>>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>      From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>>  To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>>  Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <tibo...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>>> tomee
>>>> zip).
>>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
>>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
>>> apache.
>>>
>>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>>
>>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
>>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>
>>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>

  

Reply via email to