Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> To: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
<dependency> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId> <version>0.2-incubating</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId> <version>0.1-incubating</version> </dependency> Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > great, thks > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>: >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same >> url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" >> <users@tomee.apache.org> >> Cc: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez >> <radcor...@yahoo.com> >> Cc: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> Hello Roberto, >> >> is it broken again? I get 404 >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Roberto >>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com> >>> To: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" >>> <users@tomee.apache.org> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> Hi David, >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :) >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are >>> looking into it. >>> Cheers,Roberto >>> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side >>> if needed. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez >>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests >>> we got the following results: >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - >>> OK >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, >>> but it will be there. >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) >>> Cheers,Roberto >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <tibo...@lycos.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: >>>> >>>> >>> >>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html >>>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. >>>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the >>>> tomee >>>> zip). >>>> This decision would speedup the release. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay >>> apache. >>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think. >>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>> >>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>