On Nov 15, 2007 11:22 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the recommended deployment model to support back-button usage > via > > undoable changes and disk-based serialized storage with Wicket? Is it > only > > possible using a load balancer configured to be "sticky" (keep sessions > on > > the same node during the lifetime of the session)? > > Recommended is to use sticky sessions.
+10000 none sticky sessions are flawed anyway.. (or the synchronizing performance hit is so great it doesn't make any sense, it it makes sense to start with...) johan
