Yes, but should we globalize the "annotations" namespace to mean that anyone who wants to do anything with annotations should put it inside this project? Perhaps keeping things smaller is a better idea. That way, if I want to use automount, but I don't want all of the other annotation-based goodies, I can just download this little nugget and use it.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matthijs, > > That is a good point and I did consider that, but I thought if anyone else > wants to do things with annotations and wicket in the future, this would be > a perfect place to put that code (especially given the underlying scanning > support). Thus, I was being optimistic about the future. Believe me, I > spent an hour staring out the window trying to decide on the right name. > > Hopefully the documentation explains clearly what it does. > > -Doug > > > > > Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote: > > > > Doug Donohoe wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce the 1.0 release of wicketstuff-annotation. > >> > > > > Nice. But the name 'wicketstuff-annotation' does not say anything about > > what it does, just 'something with annotations'. IMO > > 'wicketstuff-mount-annotations' or somesuch would be better. > > > > Just my 2c. > > Matthijs > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-announce--wicketstuff-annotation-1.0-released-tp17090601p17091003.html > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
