On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be better if there were a core wicket-annotation project that > provides the basics (such as the scanner) and another project called > wicket-automount (with wicket-annotation dependency)? That way other > "future" projects can utilize the core capabilities without reinventing > the wheel. This would also accommodate those who want a specific > dependency for wicket-automount.
The project can be split without needing to make one a core project though. On the long term we could consider making something like that a core project, but for now that simply wouldn't be practical. The great thing about wicket-stuff projects is that it is easy for people to join the effort. Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
