On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ligther? Does it meen with no Compund and ComponentAssignedModel?
>> Wouldn't that feel more like crippled?
>> The default model slot doesn't take any runtime space when you don't
>> use it, property would. And removing four methods from component will
>> hardly make it much lighter.
>
Big +1 on that :)

> I wasn't just thinking about models though. *I* would like us to go
> through the API when we start on 1.5 and remove anything that isn't
> necessary. Remove all the the deprecations and convenience methods
> that have (easy) alternatives. All the while keeping an easy upgrade
> path in mind of course.
>
> Of course, things like compound property models are pretty cool, and
> we should keep supporting the types of models we are supporting now.
> But maybe we can find a way to add this kind of support to components
> without needing it to be built in. Or maybe not and in the end our
> conclusion will be to stick with 1.4's model. But lets try to be
> creative before we give up on that :-)

Creative is ok for me. Destructive isn't :)
>
> We're getting a bit ahead of ourselves now though, unless we already
> want to start coding on 1.5. It is probably a better idea to finalize
> 1.4 first, and decide on what to generify by default based on the
> likeliness it will help users for this version.

Yeah, agree on this as well.

-Matej
>
> Eelco
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to