svn mv to the 1.3 branch:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3.x/

You'll have to see if whatever you already have existing in that branch can
be overwritten.

Let me know if I can be of assistance to you in any way.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com


On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <kry...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, was away.
>
> Um, I don't know where to put the old one.
>
> Basically the old code still works with Java 1.4 and wicket 1.3, where
> would
> the best place to put it be?
> just drop it?
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> jer...@wickettraining.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Rodolfo - why is there still a wicketstuff-push folder in trunk [1]?  I
> > didn't notice until today when a user asked a question about it.
> >
> > Was it an oversight, or is it something different?
> >
> > Just Curious and Confused,
> >
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <rhan...@kindleit.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core
> > > group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki)
> > >
> > > A couple of new things were done:
> > >
> > > It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and
> > > requires jetty 6.1.14.
> > > The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this
> package
> > is
> > > basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket.
> > > The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of
> > > WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application
> > Singleton
> > > and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of
> > > ways
> > > to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for
> > it)
> > >
> > > Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to