Ok, I moved it into the 1.3.x branch as you suggested so trunk can stay clean.
Thanks for the heads up on the clutter. On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected] > wrote: > svn mv to the 1.3 branch: > > https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3.x/ > > You'll have to see if whatever you already have existing in that branch can > be overwritten. > > Let me know if I can be of assistance to you in any way. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sorry, was away. > > > > Um, I don't know where to put the old one. > > > > Basically the old code still works with Java 1.4 and wicket 1.3, where > > would > > the best place to put it be? > > just drop it? > > > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < > > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > Rodolfo - why is there still a wicketstuff-push folder in trunk [1]? I > > > didn't notice until today when a user asked a question about it. > > > > > > Was it an oversight, or is it something different? > > > > > > Just Curious and Confused, > > > > > > Jeremy Thomerson > > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the > wicketstuff-core > > > > group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) > > > > > > > > A couple of new things were done: > > > > > > > > It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and > > > > requires jetty 6.1.14. > > > > The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this > > package > > > is > > > > basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. > > > > The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of > > > > WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application > > > Singleton > > > > and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple > of > > > > ways > > > > to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code > for > > > it) > > > > > > > > Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. > > > > > > > > > >
