+1 "26 Wicket Tricks" or "Wicket Cookbook" or "Wicket Recipes"
(Whenever I am trying something new I always try a cookbook, It later on acts as a reference too) taha On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Matej Knopp<matej.kn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Vladimir K<koval...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Matej Knopp-2 wrote: >>> >>> Modal Window is an ajax component. Submitting it with regular submit >>> is not supported and it never was. >>> >> >> But I would like to have AjaxFallbackModalWindow that survives page refresh. >> Why not author my own if the aims are different? Probably requirements we >> have are far from being accepted as common. > Of course you can. There's nothing wrong with that. >> >> >> >>> Again, modal window doesn't support regular submits (by design) so if >>> you want to do file upload you'll have to use a hidden iframe or some >>> other approach like that. >>> >> >> IMO, Iframe is not an approach it is a work around the limitation (made by >> design) :) > Yes. But from the beginning Modal Window was designed as Ajax Component. >> >> >> >>> I just looked at jquery dialog example. The dialog is declared in >>> markup but it is then reparented as top level DOM element. Same thing >>> wicket modalwindow does. >>> >> >> What is especial in my case is that the page height is limited by the window >> height and contains a srollable div within. Taking into account that the >> browsers we support works well with fixed positioning and assuming that the >> following excerpt works: >> >> >> >>> Fixed positioning is a special case of absolute positioning. For fixed >>> elements, the containing block is always taken to be the viewport of the >>> browser window. > This is true. Unfortunately it doesn't apply to IE6 which doesn't > support position:fixed. Modal Window was written couple of years ago > when IE6 position was quite strong, however even now we can't afford > to ignore it. Unfortunately. >>> >> >> It seems to be pretty doable. But it needs investigation. I haven't tried >> yet. > Position:fixed will work in your case if you can afford to ignore IE6. > But it's not something we can do in wicket extensions. >> >> >> >>>>Anyway it is possible to do what the modal.js is doing by Wicket means and >>>>don't have a component tree mismatch with DOM. >>> >>> Is it really? Mind sharing with me how? >>> >> >> In case if the position:fixed does not help I would subclass a Form and make >> it a container of ModalWindows. Then by placing the >> modal-window-container-form at the body level I would acquire a new >> ModalWindow from the container. Does it make sense? >> > So the ModalWindow would have to be added to the container (which I > assume would have to be added to the page itself)? That's rather > limiting. > > -Matej >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Twenty-Six-Wicket-Tricks-tp21214357p24708596.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
