http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/4968160827_b742a7448a_z.jpg
..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive? ** Martin 2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com>: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi < > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > >> Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and >> both into 1.4-x >> > > This made me laugh. What is the other side of the "bargain"? What does the > giving party get in return? :) > > Apache is all about consensus. If the project management committee (who > ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is > useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by the > committers. In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC. So, > with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x (myself > included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why it is > needed. > > That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100 > messages), so you're up against bad odds. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://wickettraining.com > *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
