Very well put and absolutely correct.  The only area in which I slightly 
disagree is your assumption that FMI actually believes those things.  It is a 
fully disingenuous attempt to avoid the possibility of some trivial one-time 
costs.




From: Phil Chernack 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:17 AM
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Cc: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:43085] Re: consumer education on the metric system


Well, I pose this one:

Does the avarage consumer know and understand the differences and relationships 
between ounces, pints, quarts and gallons?  Many times I see unit pricing in 
quarts but the items being sold have no mention of quarts on them.  They are 
either fl oz, mL or L.  It seems to me to be very disingenuous on the part of 
the food marketing industry to "claim" most consumers don't understand metric 
or rather, understand customary units better all the while they are changing 
package sizes to non-standard sizes and putting only fl oz rather than 
expressing rounded up units such as quarts or gallons.  Meantime, the unit 
pricing does not reflect these.  You know as well as I that most consumers 
don't even pay attention to the units on the package to begin with.  They buy 
by size--that is small, medium, large.  How many people have been hoodwinked 
into thinking they are buying a half-gallon carton of something when it really 
contains less.  The package size is a little smaller but it "looks" like a 
half-gallon.

As for the space argument that rationally sized metric products won't fit into 
the current racks, refridgerators or shelves is a specious one at best.  I have 
seen plenty of rationally-sized metric products in the supermarkets from soda 
and juice to cleaners and they fit fine.

One other note, the FMI refers to the "metric experiment"  I have news for 
them:  it's no experiment.  As many here can point out, many industries have 
converted to metric or work in metric with no issues and have made the 
deliberate decision to do so.  What we have is a long, slow, painful 
inevability that could be made quicker and less painful.

Phil

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Paul Trusten <trus...@grandecom.net> wrote:

  FMI claims that the American public does not understand the metric system and 
is not demanding metric products. I think there is some truth to this claim. 
Although the U.S. public has taken to metric soft drinks (and hard drinks, too) 
, it remains to be seen if the average U.S. shopper understands, upon 
inspection, how, for example, a 1 L bottle relates to a 500 mL bottle or a 750 
mL bottle.  Now, you and I on this list laugh at such a statement, because we 
have made this understanding of metric units as instinctive as cents relate to 
dollars.  But FMI is talking about the average consumer who, under the FPLA 
amendment, suddenly will be faced with labeling, shelf tags, and advertising in 
metric units only, and will have to make a purchase based upon metric-only 
labeling.  Its point that numerous questions will be handed to store personnel 
is a valid one (I speak here from personal experience as a retail pharmacist 
over the years, when any consumer-product issue comes up from behind and taps 
the public on the shoulder) .  

  We must face the fact that Americans are generally not taught or oriented to 
using, and comparing, metric units.   Buying a 2 L bottle of Coke is one thing, 
but really processing that measurement information is another.  Does the 
average shopper know that 2 L = 2000 mL, and can (s)he yet quickly and easily 
relate a 2 L bottle to a 250 mL bottle?  I don't think so. I say we need to 
work to change that.  We who extol the advantages of metric need to educate our 
fellow Americans on features, and the virtues the metric system.  This just 
isn't common knowledge yet in America. 

  Developing a plan for consumer metric education is going to be a top priority 
for me at USMA in the coming months.  

  We can accomplish two things with mass consumer education:  to reduce any 
possible public confusion over metric units,  and also to sell the decimal 
advantage of metric. 


  Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
  Public Relations Director
  U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
  www.metric.org    
  3609 Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
  Midland TX 79707-2872 US
  +1(432)528-7724
  trus...@grandecom.net

Reply via email to