I like your thinking!!! ;-)   ;-)  ;-)   (gsoh)

From: trus...@grandecom.net
To: usma@colostate.edu
Subject: [USMA:44185] RE: Downsizing beer glasses
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:39:49 -0500










I guess I'm ignorant of Jerry's and 
Stephen's facts because I am a teetotaler.
 
But now that I know all this, all I can 
say is, geesh! I'd love to work in a British hospital pharmacy. If you folks 
are 
so rigorous about measuring suds, I would think your pharmacists and pharmacy 
technicians would the best on the planet.
 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Stephen 
  Humphreys 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: 29 March, 2009 08:19
  Subject: [USMA:44182] RE: Downsizing beer 
  glasses
  
UK pubs have large drip trays and it's part of the ordering of 
  a pint to see it filled to overflowing.  Yes - they actually do fill then 
  overfill.
  

  And yes you are actually correct (cause for celebration) that only some 
  pubs have oversized pint glasses that have marks.
  

  It's been said on this very listserv that anything more than a 5% 
  head would be technically illegal.  You're special 'pint' 
  would - of course -fall foul.
  

  Having said ALL that - this "war" you've mentioned a few times today - it 
  isn't happening in the pubs. Apart from the mix of imperial and metric I've 
  never heard of a fight breaking out regarding being served a pretend metric 
  size in a pint glass - it really really does not happen - seriously.  And 
  as I said - if you believe you have been short served you can ask for a top 
up 
  - they're not going to turn you away citing some measurement war where they 
  are on the opposite side - or something equally daft.
  

  I'm a cider drinker - cider does not form a head - so I always get my 
  full measure ;-)  
  

  One of the drinks I had last night was bottled (not draught) cider. 
   As it happens it was not one of the more famous pint glasses.  Yes 
  - I had a 350ml bottle of Aspall cider.  Strangely enough I did not 
  refuse to drink it due to it being in a metric bottle.  I chose metric. 
   (Well, in reality I chose a cider I wanted and knew I liked which 
  happened to be in metric bottles).
  

  


  
  Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:56:32 -0700
From: 
  jeremiahmacgre...@rocketmail.com
Subject: Re: [USMA:44168] RE: Downsizing 
  beer glasses
To: barkatf...@hotmail.com; usma@colostate.edu


  

  
  I would tend to believe Pat's explanation.  I'm sure everyone 
  else does too. 
  

  All you have said is that beer CAN be sold in oversized glasses. 
    This does not mean it is.  You also say that one CAN ask for a top 
  up.  Again that doesn't mean people do.
  

  Somehow overfilling a glass so it over runs the brim doesn't sound right. 
   It makes for mess and makes the glass slippery, making it easier to drop 
  and cause a hazard.  Also, product is wasted and that can add up 
  to liters of lost beer that goes down the drain.   Who pays for 
  that?
  

  You just don't want to accept that  when you ask for a pint, you are 
  only getting  500 mL of liquid, not a milliliter more.
  

  Maybe now you would like to discuss how wine and spirits are sold in 
  rounded metric sizes in UK pubs.  Of course a pro-choice person such as 
  yourself would never order such items for fear of having to utter the 
  word milliliter.
  

  Jerry
  

  
  
  From: Stephen Humphreys 
  <barkatf...@hotmail.com>
To: U.S. Metric Association 
  <usma@colostate.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 8:39:55 
  PM
Subject: [USMA:44168] RE: 
  Downsizing beer glasses

Pints in the UK can be served in 
  oversized glasses (showing pint markings) or with 'brim' amounts.  You 
  can go back to ask for it to be topped up if you think that the pint is not a 
  legal pint.
  

  In reality the bar server tends to pour beer into a glass so it overruns 
  the side - giving you the full pint.  I've never seen a pint as small as 
  500ml.  Ever.
  

  'Heady' drinks are poured in a specific way  - eg Guinness. 
   There's a 'knack'.  Esp in the case of guinness the white head 
  forms part of the 'experience'.  Sometimes a shamrock is 'drawn' into the 
  head.  In some areas of Northern Ireland this is seen as 'politically 
  incorrect' ;-) .
  

  Drinks like cider and lager tend to be headless and don't have the same 
  issue.  I would suspect cider and lager are the most asked pint style 
  drinks.
  

  Some pubs are now doing 'third' pint drinks now.  My favourite one 
  is.


  
  From: pat.naugh...@metricationmatters.com
To: 
  usma@colostate.edu
Subject: [USMA:44162] Downsizing beer glasses
Date: 
  Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:16:44 +1100


  
  On 2009/03/29, at 2:45 AM, Jeremiah MacGregor wrote:
  I'm 
    sure Pat can tell us that the pint is still spoken in pubs in Australia, 
but 
    no one would use it to mean a specific amount and thus the term has become 
    generic.

  
  
  
  
  Dear Jerry,
  

  Sadly, it is true that the word, pint, is still 
  used in Australian hotels. And it is still used, as it is in the UK, to hide 
a 
  long period of downsizing by the beer companies in collusion with government 
  consumer affairs officials.
  

  Let me explain what I mean.
  

  Years ago when a pint was served in an Australia or 
  UK hotel or pub, the beer was served in a 22 ounce container to allow for a 
  pint of beer and for a suitable 'head' of froth. Likewise a half pint of beer 
  was served in an 11 ounce container to allow for the 10 ounce half pint and 
  the appropriate head.
  

  Some time ago, in the order of 50 years I suspect, 
  lobbyists from the beer companies were able to convince legislators (or was 
it 
  regulation writers) that a pint of beer could be served in a pint container 
  that held a pint of water when filled to the brim of the glass. The law 
makers 
  suitably rolled over like little puppies to get their tummies tickled and, in 
  both Australia and the UK, if you asked for 'a pint of beer' in the 
  last 50 years you would have received very close to 500 millilitres of beer 
  with about 70 millilitres of 'head'. I leave to others to calculate this 
  roughly 10 % gain in profits by the beer companies deceit over this 
  period of time.
  

  The next part of the campaign, as I observe it in 
  the 21st century, is to downsize the beer glass from a pint (568 mL) to a 
  rounded 500 mL glass. Naturally to do this the beer companies will need to 
  reduce the size of the 'beer pint' even further. The Guinness company has 
  already begun this process with their 440 mL can designed with enough beer to 
  fit into a glass that holds 500 mL of air to the brim of the glass before you 
  pour in the 440 mL of beer and the 60 mL of froth. I have noticed that this 
  campaign has, so far, been tried in Australia and in Singapore.
  

  To answer Jerry's question a little more directly, 
  it seems to me that the use of the word 'pint', and its continued 
  encouragement and support by beer companies, is to maintain the illusion that 
  drinkers are getting more beer that they actually receive.
  

  As a side issue, the word 'pint' is a relative to 
  the word 'paint' from the time that Roman soldiers demanded that a 
  paint mark be used on the side of (opaque ?) beer containers so that drinkers 
  could check that the level of liquid beer was 'up to the paint'. Paint 
  was gradually changed over the last 2000 years to the word, 'pint'. But you 
  will note that the rapaciousness of beer makers and sellers is not a new 
  thing!
  

  Cheers,
   
  Pat Naughtin
  
  PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
  Geelong, Australia
  Phone: 61 3 5241 2008
  
  Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat 
  Naughtin, has helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to 
  the modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now 
  save thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for their 
  businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many different trades, 
  crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication 
  leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian 
  Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the 
UK, 
  and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com/for more metrication 
information, contact Pat 
  at pat.naugh...@metricationmatters.com or to get the 
  free 'Metrication matters' 
  newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to 
  subscribe.


  
  Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free. Try it 
  Now! 
  


  
  Windows Live Messenger just got better. Find out 
  more! 
_________________________________________________________________
View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/

Reply via email to