Ian and Nick, Thanks for the assistance. Attached are dropbox links to two snapshot photos: 1) the factory label on the back of the N210, showing N210 r:2.0 and 2) a top side view of the N210.
1) https://www.dropbox.com/s/u92x02rni71kfb3/20190509_133253.jpg?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/u92x02rni71kfb3/20190509_133253.jpg?dl=0> 2) https://www.dropbox.com/s/1p8ocqf4qcr9ohb/20190509_133800.jpg?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/1p8ocqf4qcr9ohb/20190509_133800.jpg?dl=0> Seems this unit is indeed a rev 2 N210, yes? Joe > On May 9, 2019, at 12:40 PM, Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Moreover, the best "tell" is to look at the N210 motherboard. If the SRAM > chip is on the top side, it's a rev 2/3. If the SRAM is on the bottom side, > it's a rev 4. If you send a picture along of the top of the N210, I can tell > you if it's early or late rev. > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:36 AM Ian Buckley via USRP-users > <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> wrote: > Joe, > So I scratched my head about this a little late last night and looked back > through the development repository for the N210 and as far as I can tell > there was never customer facing FPGA code for a Rev2 N210. Chatting with Matt > this morning he shared my feeling that a Rev2 wasn't sold to customers, so > I'm curious if you have a unit that has a factory label that says N210Rev2 or > if you have seen "usrp2 rev2.0" on the PCB (which can be missleading). > > Also have you tried booting into the safe image and verifying that it at > least pings on 192.168.10.2? > > If we can conclusively identify which rev of h/w you have I can probably help > further. > > Ian
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
