With recent versions of UHD, you can use the normal CPU UHD code and tell the USRP to stream samples to a different IP address. That would be the address of your PL-connected 10GBase ports on the ZCU102.


On 04.01.23 20:27, Pedro Pereira wrote:

    it seems likely that you could port UHD to the Linux ARM CPU on the ZCU102, 
and then
    you could talk to either the N210 or N310 via the network ports from your 
ZCU102.


As I said, I have an SW-only version of my receiver running on the ZCU102 and communicating with the USRP successfully. But the problem is I get the samples from the application level. In the Hybrid version of my receiver, I don't want to receive samples at the application level. As I said, I want to read directly in my hardware block design, in the ZCU102.

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 19:06, Pedro Pereira <pedro60...@gmail.com> wrote:

        If you're asking "can you make your ZCU102 code run on the N310?" 
possibly.
        There's a dual-core ARM CPU running Linux, and
          a large FPGA fabric.


    Is there any documentation for doing this? My receiver is implemented in 
c++, I
    think I would have to implement device drivers to read data from the 
hardware to the
    software application.
    I only found documentation for importing standard/custom hardware IP blocks 
to
    gnuradio.

    On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 16:36, Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

        On 03/01/2023 10:54, Pedro Pereira wrote:
        Thanks for the response.

        I don´t want to run the software component of the GNSS receiver on my 
computer,
        while connected to the N310 for heterogeneous processing - if that's 
what
        you're saying.
        I want an edge device running embedded linux, like I already have on my 
zcu102,
        to run both sw and hw components.

        The first stages of the processing chain are in hardware so I don´t 
want to
        read samples from the front-end at the application level. I want to read
        samples directly from my hardware block design, do some heavy 
processing and
        deliver the results to the software application.
        I can do all of this using AD front-ends and their HDL reference 
designs. Is
        there any support to do this using N210 or N310?

        Thanks again.

        It's still not entirely clear what it is you're asking.

        The N310 has a Zynq FPGA + 2 AD9371 radios + 2 SFP+ network ports.

        This makes it somewhat similar to your ZCU102, but with radios already 
built-in.

        If you're asking "can you make your ZCU102 code run on the N310?" 
possibly. 
        There's a dual-core ARM CPU running Linux, and
          a large FPGA fabric.

        If you're asking "can I make my ZCU102 acquire samples from either N310 
or
        N210?" -- given that your ZCU102 has some SFP+
          ports that could be configured for 1GiGe (or even 10GiGe in the case 
of N310)
        -- it seems likely that you could port UHD to
          the Linux ARM CPU on the ZCU102, and then you could talk to either 
the N210 or
        N310 via the network ports from your ZCU102.


        On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:15, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com> 
wrote:

            Note that the N310's FPGA might actually be large enough to fit in 
(parts
            of) a GNSS receiver, especially if you remove the DUC chain of the 
TX path,
            in case you don't need that. RFNoC is Ettus' framework for 
extending the
            FPGA functionality, especially made for such use cases.

            Note that even in RFNoC you get a stream of samples from the radio
            frontend, which you basically paid NI/Ettus for to design it for 
you, so
            that you don't have to worry about how to talk to the physical 
hardware and
            can care about signal processing :)

            Cheers,
            Marcus


            On 03.01.23 16:11, Marcus Müller wrote:

            Hi Mr Pereira,

            the directest access you get to samples in the N210 is the ethernet
            connection – and that has no downside for GNSS applications, as the 
VITA49
            samples fully represent the RF signal, thanks to Shannon-Nyquist.

            That is, of course, unless you start modifying the FPGA image of 
the N210,
            and make it a completely different product. It's kind of unlikely 
you want
            to do that.

            Greetings,
            Marcus

            On 03.01.23 14:25, Pedro Pereira wrote:

            Greetings,

            I have 2 USRP front-ends - N210 and N310. I want to develop a GNSS
            Receiver inside my FGPA - xilinx ZCU102 - and use one of the USRP 
devices
            only as the front-end. The receiver is quite large so I need an 
external
            board for all the signal processing chain. The receiver has two
            implementations - software-only & hybrid. In hybrid mode some tasks 
of
            the processing chain are accelerated in hardware.

            The software-only version of the receiver running on my ZCU102 is 
able to
            configure the N210 and read packets over ethernet correctly. 
However,
            with the hybrid version of the receiver, I want to read the digital 
IQ
            samples from the front end directly in hardware.

            For example, I am able to do this with the ZCU102 connected to 
FMComm2/3
            using the FMC connection on the FPGA. AD provides HDL reference 
designs
            to support communication between multiple front-ends and multiple 
FPGAs.

            Is there a similar way to read the digital samples directly in 
hardware
            using the N210? The N210 only has the ethernet and a MIMO port.

            Thanks in advance.



            _______________________________________________
            USRP-users mailing list --usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
            To unsubscribe send an email tousrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
            _______________________________________________
            USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
            To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com


        _______________________________________________
        USRP-users mailing list --usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
        To unsubscribe send an email tousrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

        _______________________________________________
        USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
        To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list --usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email tousrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to