Hi thanks Michael, So @Chairs, as the shepherd I kindly request if you can please reflect the intended status of the document on the datatracker.
I see the authors are working on addressing Daniel's comments (and other things), hope we can move forward soon! Regards, Renzo On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 7:57 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Renzo Navas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That said, the latest Daniel's [1] message is still not responded > to, > >> so we will wait until authors respond before moving the draft > forward. > >> [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/lmjYqDp5G_nudqlfE4PvubGvzq4/ > > > Also, the document's intended status is "Standards Track", > > I think this should be also noted in the "Intended RFC status" field > > in the datatracker, > > but is currently not noted. Who can make that change? > > The chairs only. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
