Hi Martin!

Thank you for the TSVART review. We addressed both nits.

In Section 9, we replaced the generic statement that the RFC 7925 discussion is 
applicable with
an explicit normative recommendation to use the RFC 6520 Heartbeat Extension
when a TLS/DTLS-level keep-alive or path MTU discovery mechanism is needed.

We also changed “may not” to “might not” in Section 8 to avoid ambiguity.

The PR is here: https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot/pull/203

Ciao
Hannes


_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to