> Hello. > > Please see the attachment. Don't take this code seriously, this is > the early prototype and everything should be rewritten. It barely > uses utrace, only to stop the target. > > (gdb) file /path/to/binary > (gdb) target extended-remote /proc/ugdb > (gdb) attach PID > (gdb) disassemble _start
What is the reasoning for selecting /proc/ugdb instead of something like /proc/<pid>/ugdb? We had a discussion sometime back in utrace_devel https://www.redhat.com/archives/utrace-devel/2008-June/msg00070.html where we thought having /proc/utrace was a bad choice. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar
