> You know, aside from the vi-emacs debate this is probably one of the 
> most common topics on uug - How to get xxx wireless card to work in 
> Linux.  All of these cards work just fine under Windows but its a huge 
> pain to get them to work under Linux.  Also, every card seems to have a 
> different set of hoops to jump through.  Why can't this be better?  Why 
> can't the process be the same for every card and just substitute in the 
> correct driver?  Why does it have to require recompiling the kernel in 
> so many cases to get this to work?  So many people are using wireless 
> pcmcia cards these days, you'd think it would be easier.
> 
> In other words, since its so popular, why can't it be easier?

Wireless is one of my biggest complaints about Linux. Yesterday I got my
internal wireless working on my new laptop. It wasn't too bad, but I did
have to add a one line kernel patch. Luckily, wireless is getting
better. It took me 3 days to get it working when I got my first card 
a while back (before it was really popular).

The 2.6 kernel (from what I've read [1]) should have a more unified wireless
subsystem/API. 

The problem with wireless is two fold (in my opinion):

1) 802.11 is still a pretty new technology. There are standards out
there but vendors are much less likely to follow them. Every version of
a card seems to have a different firmware, and people still can't agree
on a lot of stuff (802.11g just got the final official stamp of approval
from the standards body but vendors have been making cards for a while;
they tend to just work with their APs).

2) Vendors won't release the specs to their cards. This happens for
several reasons but I have to run work on a group project so I can list
them here... I'll finish this later, or someone else if they want... :-)

-Evan

[1] http://www.kniggit.net/wwol26.html

-- 
/********************************************************************\
       Evan McNabb: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                     http://evan.mcnabbs.org
             System Administrator, CS Department, BYU
 GnuPG Fingerprint: 53B5 EDCA 5543 A27A E0E1 2B2F 6776 8F9C 6A35 6EA5
\********************************************************************/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to