On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:15, Andrew Jorgensen wrote: > But I just got an email from Xmission about it. You can have naked DSL > with Xmission or any other ISP (well, maybe not Covad, since they lease > DSL from Qwest). Maybe I misunderstood you.
I didn't know that any other ISP would do the same deal (although it makes sense, seeing as Qwest is *always* involved with DSL no matter who your billing statement comes from. The qwest.net ISP is in my opinion a better option than Xmission or speakeasy since it's a bare ISP (just DHCP and DNS servers), with no restrictions, and is quite a bit cheaper than any of the other ISPs which offer things like e-mail and personal web space, none of which I am interested in. (Linode rocks). Michael > > > ____________________ > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list -- Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
