Actually it is XMissions fault. They said it was too expensive for them since they are based in SLC. iProvo has been accepting applications for providers since before the roll out. Just because only one company decided to do it at first does not mean it's a monopoly that was forced by the city.
Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Andrew McNabb > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 7:14 PM > To: BYU Unix Users Group > Subject: Re: [uug] iProvo stinks > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:01:01PM -0700, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > > I was really bummed about XMission not picking up on iProvo. It would be > > nice to not have to worry about their transfer quotas though. > > > > It's not XMission's fault. iProvo established a monopoly for the first > few years of the system (I still don't get the benefit). > > -- > Andrew McNabb > http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/ > PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868 -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
