I'm kinda confused. I always thought the big fishes of version control were CVS and SVN. How do these other ones (Darcs/git) compare? Are they totally different tools?
On 8/27/07, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/26/07, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Andrew McNabb [Sun, 26 Aug 2007 at 09:22 -0600] > > > If you come on Tuesday, you might get a free git tutorial. :) I've > been > > > using it recently for version control on personal projects. > > > > I haven't used git, but I use darcs for all my personal projects. Darcs > > is fast and simple > > If you think Darcs is fast, your mind will explode when you try git. > It's usually hard to tell it's doing anything because it goes so > flippin' fast. 'git' is even faster to type! As for the simple > part...well, yes, darcs wins there, but git doesn't have to be as > complicated as most tutorials make it. I still get "changes" and > "whatsnew" confused though. What's so wrong with status and log? > > Bryan > -------------------- > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > > The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their > author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list > -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
