> The main distributed revision control systems that I think are worth > looking at are Git, Mercurial, Darcs, and Bazaar. They each have > different strengths and weaknesses, and I'm partial to Git, but they all > have some huge advantages over centralized revision control systems.
I don't know why everyone forgets arch: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/ I mean from what I hear arch is terrible, but it is one of the original distributed SCM's. Let's make sure we get everyone on the distributed revision control team, even if they are losers and picked last. Adam -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
