On 8/27/07, Adam Findley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The main distributed revision control systems that I think are worth > > looking at are Git, Mercurial, Darcs, and Bazaar. They each have > > different strengths and weaknesses, and I'm partial to Git, but they all > > have some huge advantages over centralized revision control systems. > > I don't know why everyone forgets arch: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/ > I mean from what I hear arch is terrible, but it is one of the > original distributed SCM's. Let's make sure we get everyone on the > distributed revision control team, even if they are losers and picked > last.
I think arch is an ancestor of bazaar. It's probably safe to leave it off the team. Think of arch as a once-great retired player. Bryan -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
