Jacob Albretsen wrote: > Quoting Michael Torrie <[email protected]>: >> Normal users? Just how many ubuntu and fedora users even have "admins?" >> This idea that there are users and admins is fine in an enterprise, or >> possibly in a household with teenage kids. But 99% of all ubuntu and >> fedora installs are single-user home systems. > > Source? ;) 99% of statistics are made up on the spot you know.
As was this one. But think about it. Fedora and ubuntu are aimed at individual users' computers. >> But then again I wouldn't run Fedora on enterprise >> desktops (or Ubuntu for that matter, except the LTS editions). > > You and I would make good choices like that, but many others don't. Fedora can't be held responsible for inappropriate use of their distro. > I recall someone recently not liking my answer when they came to me in > a panic wondering why they could not find any Fedora Core 4 mirrors so > they could install some rpms on their productions servers. Telling > them Fedora 9 isn't even supported anymore didn't sit well. Well it's upon their heads. Fedora has always been a short-lived distro and enterprise use (except for the CS dept where they know what they are doing). On the other hand if it was you that installed FC 4 on a production server, then you deserve to be fired! -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
