On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Eric Olsen <[email protected]> wrote: > I've always liked Tomato more than dd-wrt. I don't know if things got > better, but when I tried dd-wrt it felt bloated to me.
I would also recommend Tomato for its good feature to footprint ratio. I've actually avoided dd-wrt because of the problem they've had with all kinds of license violations. http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/columns/article.php/3816236/The-DD-WRT-Controversy.htm Not sure where they stand now, but for a while they were definitely violating the GPL, and heavily implicated in illicitly taking code from the likes of Broadcom, Intel, and others. Given that stigma I'm always surprised how many OSS users advocate people continue to use dd-wrt. Ends justify the means, I suppose. Nick -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
