> Currently JITTester only generates common, instance classes. This PR suggests 
> a value classes support for the tool.
> 
> Specifically, it:
> - adds a ValueKlass as an AST node carrier for the new type
> - moves most of KlassFactory internals  into generic AbstractKlassFactory
> - adds smaller concrete KlassFactory and ValueKlassFactory.
> - makes sure that we don't generate mutable fields in the value classes
> - blocks synchronized usage on value-class methods
> - raises probability to be abstract for the value classes - to check deeper 
> hierarchies.
> - adds a parameter governing the balance between instance and value classes. 
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Evgeny Nikitin has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Remove 'final' for the value classes
 - Grammar fix in comment

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2346/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2346/files/42442bac..40bb2ded

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=2346&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=2346&range=00-01

  Stats: 2 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2346.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/2346/head:pull/2346

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2346

Reply via email to