On Wed, 6 May 2026 02:19:22 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Check with Dan Smith but I believe the preferred terminology now is to talk 
> about objects that lack identity rather than objects that are value objects - 
> ref the dropping of java.util.Objects::isValueObject in favour of hasIdentity.

I've pushed the spec wording update with use of the `non-identity object` 
instead of the `value object` notion.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2386#issuecomment-4384954338

Reply via email to