On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Itamar Gal <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know very little about networking or about packer, but I would have that
> the automated installer would correctly configure the network interfaces on
> the guest. I don't suppose you have any idea as to why or how this might
> have happened?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Cheers,
> Itamar
>
Depends on the guest OS... I also suggest you ask the packer devs...
See if this makes a difference
https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43090#p193693
In Fedora land, "eth0" "eth1" is deprecated if you use the default
(biosdevname), and replaced with the much more meaningless "em16" "em17..."
(at least on my system, running over real hardware -not virtualized-)...
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2012-May/418967.html
There's a packer mailing list hosted on Google Groups, here:
http://groups.google.com/group/packer-tool
Good luck!
FC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
VBox-users-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe:
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
