Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 9/24/2000 3:55 PM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jon Stevens wrote:
> >>
> >> on 9/24/2000 3:12 PM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> What about those of us (obviously foolish souls) that don't use Turbine?
> >>
> >> We are providing an excellent solution to solve that problem that you are
> >> discussing. If you don't like it, then you are going to be forced to come up
> >> with your own solution or help us change our solution to match your tastes.
> >
> > Just to make it clear to me, are you saying that Turbine specifically is
> > the solution to allow cleaner handling of an undefined reference in
> > general Velocity template processing?
>
> No. I'm saying that Turbine solves the problems that you changed the subject
> to talk about. :-) Maybe you should go look at what Turbine is so that you
> have a better understanding of what you are trying to discuss. :-)
I didn't think the subject changed, but rather we were exploring ways to
address it and related issues. And I did look at it about 5 months ago
and chose not to use it for various reasons, mostly to respect client
sensitivity towards my use of non-major-brandname parts, such as linux,
servlets, webmacro, mySQL (for non transactional stuff), etc rather than
Sun, WebLogic, JSP, Oracle. Tossing Turbine onto the heap was too much
since I had no experience with it. I had no experience at the time with
webmacro either, but felt then that it wasn't too far away from JSP to
be too big a risk.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
