I don't see how we're asking for expansive rights by not allowing corporations to take our work in its entirety, display it and profit from it with no attribution or direct linkage. I don't see how seeking permission and or compensation for usage of our work is somehow a giant leap.
There's some kind of disconnect. Cheers, Ron On Jan 28, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote: > On 1/28/07, Ron Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > there is a big difference from playing a ditty at a wedding > > and selling CDs by the truckload. They are not like at all. Of > course > > they were wrong to argue that. > > Under the law there is no difference between playing a ditty > at a wedding and selling CDs by the truckload. If it's a reasonable > claim against a giant corporation selling CDs by the truckload, it's a > reasonable claim against an individual playing a ditty at a wedding. > > That's the entire reason I'm willing to expose myself to your anger > in this conversation. The expansive rights that you and many other > videobloggers are asking for would be a catastrophe in the hands of > big corporations, and if you get them then they do to. > > -Lucas > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
