It's comparable to MP4 flavors Xvid and Dvix, no? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Harold Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't 3ivx also better to use if you want your videos to be playable > on older computers, since H264 takes a bit more processing power? (An > analogy could be developing a website that will display properly in > older browser.) Is this true, or am I misinformed? > > Harold
- [videoblogging] 3ivx v5 is out for mac & win &... Steve Watkins
- Re: [videoblogging] 3ivx v5 is out for mac &... Harold Johnson
- [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5 is out for mac &... Brad Hood
- [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5 is out for m... Harold
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5 is o... andrew michael baron
- [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5 is ... Steve Watkins
- [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5 is out f... Steve Watkins
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5... andrew michael baron
- [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5... Steve Watkins
- [videoblogging] Re: 3ivx v5... Steve Watkins
- Re: [videoblogging] Re:... andrew michael baron
- Re: [videoblogging] Re:... Brook Hinton
- [videoblogging] Re: 3iv... Steve Watkins