I think Markus was talking about Times person of the year issue where they named the person of the year as "you."
Are your friends familuar with YouTube? That's videoblogging. When you talk about things like "most famous" etc. Those are hard things to quantify. There are Videobloggers like Zefrank who is very famous in some circles but is virtually unknown in others. And he never did put his stuff on YouTube and yet the most popular YouTubers probably get way more views than he ever did--and it's very likely that few on this list had ever heard of them. What I'm saying is "fame" is relative. Some of us are "famous" to a few--which sounds like an oxymoron, but it's true in a way. But thats the world we live in now--even conventional definitions of what seem like simple things like "fame" don't really mean anything anymore. So what I'm saying is that your question isn't an easy one to answer. To someone not familuar with internet video none of us doing this is famous in the least. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS http://lofistl.com http://billstreeter.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "oovooworld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well yes I'd heard I was mentioned but I was hoping someone else was > kicking around with half the skill...its a lot of pressure to live > with you know...<sigh> > > I don't know how I missed that issue of Time. Was it the same one that > had the article reviewing George Bush's new pioneering green policy? >
